Justice Michael Mtambo has explained reasons why he refused to grant Raphael Kasambara an application that the judge hearing the case of attempted murder and conspiracy to commit murder of former budget director Paul Mphwiyo, recuse himself from hearing the case.
Kasambara found with case to answer and self represented lawyer in the case made an application that judge Justice Michael Mtambo should recuse himself from hearing the case.
He cited that Mtambo in his ruling on case to answer or no case to answer had brought issues that were not testified by the witnesses. He added that the judgment which saw three others being acquitted from the case had predetermined issues that would make the judge use in his final judgment and the judge seem to be siding with the prosecution.
However, justice Mtambo said, he remains professional and that he cannot take side. Mtambo also mentioned that his judgment of case to answer or no case to answer Kasambara was favored as the judge dropped him from the case of attempted murder.
The case has been adjourned to 24th July 2015 following defense application that the court produce court records of the witnesses to enable them ably prepare for the defense.
On House Keeping, the court also agreed that the same date the defense shall tell the court if the accused are going to testify or remain silent. If they are going to testify the defense shall also be expected to inform the court if they are going to testify alone or are calling witnesses (This is in the view of the law which requires that it is not automatic that the person accused in the crime would testify in defense (right to remain silence))
Raphael Kasambara is one of the suspects in the case together with McDonal Kumwembe and Pika Manondo answering attempted murder of Paul Mphwiyo. Three others; Dauka Manondo, Robert Kadzuwa and Oswald Lutepo were acquitted after being found with no case to answer.
No comments:
Post a Comment