Cashgate Case: Lawyer Refuse Comment On Katengeza 5yr Sentence As State Express Excitement

Katengeza

Lawyer for Angela Katengeza, Gilbert Khonyongwa, says he needs more time to go through the ruling made on Tuesday before making his comment to press.

Katengeza who was answering to Money laundering of K105 million in 2013 was sentenced to 5 years imprisonment by Lilongwe High Court justice Fiona Mwale.

Asked to comment on the verdict, Khonyongwa said he need ample time to look at the judgment and after he will make his position.

Khonyongwa

“As of now I could not comment much until I go through it at my own time and then determine my position on that.” He said adding that his client will decide on whether to appeal the ruling or not but that will be after they go through the ruling

Several mitigation factors that defense submitted to court were refused. Reacting to this Khonyongwa conceded that the court has authority to consider or to disregard the mitigation factors.

“In terms of the law the court has the final discretion how it handles the sentence. So, from its analysis it has decided to ignore some of the mitigation factors. So that is the position of the court” he conceded

Saidi

Meanwhile, the state has welcomed the court verdict of 5 year prison sentence to Angela Katengeza 

Imran Saidi a state advocate described the verdict by Justice Fiona Mwale as an indication that justice is still taking its course in the country.

“Beyond what the Court has found we wouldn’t have any comment but I think that is a reflection of justice that it is still taking its course in our land.” He said

Judge indicated that Katengeza was supposed to serve a total of six years inprisonment but because of old age and health problems of the convict, one year has been deducted to make the sentence be at 5 years. 

Commenting on this reduction Saidi said “As I said, it is the Court discretion that when it is sentencing there are a lot of circumstances and matters that it puts into considerate on. It is our view and belief that at least what the court found by deduction one year, it is still in order.”

On the ongoing and future cashgate cases he said “This is a positive development. As a state we have always relied upon court duty and the way courts conduct its activities. It is a reflection to the effect that at least the justice is still prevailing and we believe that will still send a signal to the rest of the other offenders probably it is high time that they can make decision of coming forward to plead guilty and probably surrender whatever they acquired from our state coffers.”