Cashgate: Katengeza Maintains Innocent Plea... Cried In Court

Katengeza hiding her face

Angela Katengeza on Tuesday, maintains she was dragged in the Cashgate scam unknowingly by convict Leonard Kalonga as the court also learn she was studying to become a Pastor when her company certificates was used to defraud government.

Katengeza owner of Faith Construction, was involved in looting of public money dubbed cashgate after her bank account had received two cheques in separate occasions without rendering any service to government.

In self confession, Leonard Kalonga said he recruited 17 contractors among them Katengeza company which brought new contractor in the scam. And that everyone was explained and aware of the scam.

However, Katengeza categorically denies any awareness of the scam and recruiter role. 

She insists, Kalonga never explained to her that he would use her company certificate to defraud government. But explained that she lend Leonard Kalonga her company certificate after he claimed that there was an emergency tender at his office which requires a construction company to place a bid but he could not use his company certificates since he was a civil servant there.

Angela Katengeza troed hard to hide
Her face

Katengeza said in his approach, Kalonga also disclosed that the work was to be done in Mangochi district where “Amayi” (Dr. Joyce Banda, Malawi’s former president) was expected to open as part of her campaign.

Katengeza who at first was serene in the court dock standing before Justice Fiona Mwale, was then shedding tears as she was responding to questions from state prosecutor, Reyneck Matemba.

Katengeza also denied claim by Kalonga statement that she brought a contractor in the scam.

“Kalonga, asked me to get him other contractors but I advised him not to do so because some contractors are untrustworthy, they can runaway with the money. But he insisted on his wish. 

Then I called my brother who always help me whenever am in trouble. I explained that there was this job which he rebuffed but Kalonga kept pressure that I should try to convince him to accept the deal. Later, he (Kalonga) continued to demand names and contact numbers for my brother’s company which I shared him so that he can just contact himself” Katengeza narrates

“If I was aware of this scam, definitely I would not have loved to put my brother in trouble. But I was cheated and used to do this work. But this was a scam by government officers and not us. Even my name including of companies implicated in this scam were never mentioned in Kalonga statement that we were present in their secret meetings. This proves that we were dragged in the scam unknowingly” said Katengeza who was sobbing as she tried to prove her innocence

It was said in the court by the state prosecutor, Reyneck Matemba that the suspect got first cheque amounting to K36 million which she deposited into her account at FDH Bank in City Centre in Lilongwe then she withdrew the money to Kalonga and a month later she did the same for second cheque amounting to K69 million.

But Katengeza told the court that from all the cheques, she only got K3 million commission which also covered costs for use of her company certificates, bank account overdraft, fuel and airtime.

She also contradicted herself during cross examination when mentioning that she used to withdraw the money in phases due to bank restrictions which permitted her to withdraw money not exceeding K20 million or sometimes K20 million. But later changed after being quizzed by the state after noting that she has changed the tune. She then went to her earlier statement that the money was withdrawn upon demand and per amount needed by Leonard Kalonga when said he needed to buy materials for the project. She also indicated that some times it was difficult to withdraw the large amount of money because ot was difficult to carry them. 

After examination in chief the suspect Katengeza looked too fatigue that she needed a court personnel to help her walk to the other side of the court dock.

Meanwhile the case has been adjourned to a later date for Judgment which would either see her being convicted or acquitted. The defense is expected to make written submissions by 7th of October 2015 while the prosecution will be expected to respond by 28th of October 2015.