Thursday 9 April 2015

Mphwiyo Shooting Case: Chalunda's Changing Testimony Forces the State to Use Audio Affidavit On Thursday

  • Chalunda has insisted not to make testimony to a case which charged him of perjury
  • He denies the suspects he previously claimed had met him before Mphwiyo shooting



The State in the case of Attempted murder and Conspiracy to commit murder of Malawi’s former Budget Director Mr. Paul Mphwiyo has been left with no option but to use audio affidavit recorded from its key witness Charles Chalunda who has completely withdrawn his earlier written affidavits and any evidence told investigators.


State witness, Chalunda who was brought to Lilongwe High Court on Wednesday following a subpoena is denying every statement which was taken by police investigators into the shooting of Paul Mphwiyo saying he sees point to testify to a case which he was convicted and charged of perjury.


The crucial witnesses in the ongoing case of attempted murder of former Budget Director Paul Mphwiyo in September 13, 2013 has also denied any knowledge of five suspects being accused of plotting to kill Mphwiyo.


Chalunda is the man who previously confessed to the police investigators that he together with McDonald Kumwembe travelled from Blantyre to Lilongwe on robbery mission, but everything changed when the two, met Oswald Lutepo at Bwandilo market in area 47 in Lilongwe who instructed them to shoot to kill a man named Paul Mphwiyo.


His affidavit taken that time, also indicates that after they were shown a picture of Mphwiyo, and later taken to see his house in Area 43 as well as places he frequents, they failed to execute the mission as one day were spotted by a lead investigator, Kankhwala Chilinda sharing K1 million part of their payment. 


After pulling out from the mission, Chalunda therein also said, few weeks later heard that Paul Mphwiyo had been shot.


However, Charles Chalunda withdrawn the affidavit saying he lied under oath. He also changed that the man who he met at Bwandilo was not Lutepo but Pika Manondo. This led to his conviction and subsequently charged with perjury by court in Zomba.


On Wednesday evening, Chalunda who looked so angry as he stood in the dock, had at the very beginning refused to take plea and said, could not continue making testimony to a case which has already ended him being charged with perjury. He even expressed wonder why the state had taken him from Blantyre to Lilongwe by an army of police officers.


It took several minutes including a 10 minute suspension of the court proceedings and other interventions to make him calm and accept to take an oath which he did after.


Though he took oath, Chalunda denied everything that Director of Public Prosecution (DPP) Mary Kachale asked him of his knowledge of prior plans and persons in the shooting of Mphwiyo as earlier stated in his affidavit.


Chalunda’s apparent unfriendly mood and responses during cross examination in chief prompted Kachale to make a request to Justice Michael Mtambo to declare the witness as ‘Hostile Witness’. Though the witness answered some questions but insisted that though he signed for two affidavits having different statement but whatever he said was a lie.


The DPP has therefore sought other means of presenting his testimony. This Thursday morning the state is bringing to court an audio affidavit which Chalunda had explained all what had happened pertaining to the shooting of Paul Mphwiyo and intimidation being made by some of the defendants.


Chalunda is one of the state witnesses who also raised an alarm to the investigators claiming that his life is at stake as some of the accused persons are issuing intimidation and had asked for police protection and be transferred to a safe place elsewhere in Mangochi district. 


His claim led the state to make a request though not successful but was asking Justice Michael Mtambo to revoke bail for all five accused persons. Such fears also prompted government to deploy more than 10 armed police officers at the High Court premises every time the case is convened for witness protection.

No comments:

Post a Comment